CitelyMed
Sample AI Visibility Audit
Minimally-Invasive Spine Devices
June 2026  ·  15 prompts per engine

Your brand has a citation gap.

We ran 60 AI queries across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini — here's who's winning the AI shortlist.
60
AI prompts run across
4 major engines
5
Spine device brands
tracked in this audit
0
Claude citations for
Amplify Surgical
1
Globus Medical
Large-cap spine
25
2
Medtronic
Large-cap spine
19
3
Joimax
Mid-size spine
17
4
Amplify Surgical TARGET
Small-cap spine
10
5
DePuy Synthes
Large-cap ortho
9
ChatGPT
19
Claude
20
Perplexity
14
Gemini
27
Globus
Medtronic
Joimax
Amplify
DePuy
Raw Citation Counts
Company ChatGPT Claude Perplexity Gemini Total / 60
Globus Medical 7747 25
Medtronic 4825 19
Joimax 5453 17
Amplify Surgical TARGET 1018 10
DePuy Synthes 2124 9

Amplify Surgical is invisible on Claude (0 citations) despite ranking highest on Gemini (8). Strong performance on one engine does not transfer — citation share must be earned platform by platform.

Surgeons and procurement teams use AI to generate vendor shortlists before visiting any website.

A brand absent from AI answers is removed from consideration before sales contact begins.

Citation share is invisible in web analytics — but it directly shapes inbound volume.

Summary & Recommended Next Steps
Key Shortcomings

Amplify Surgical’s web presence is heavily focused on branded concepts such as dualX®, dualPortal®, and dualLIF, with relatively little indication -level or procedure-level content written in the generic language surgeons and procurement teams use when querying AI assistants. As a result, AI models recognize the brand but lack enough structured, query-aligned evidence to confidently recommend it alongside larger incumbents in top-of-funnel vendor answers.

Suggested Next Moves
  • Build indication-focused hubs (e.g., endoscopic TLIF, LLIF with small portal access) that explain when and why these approaches are used, then anchor dualX®/dualPortal® within that context.
  • Add AI-friendly FAQs and comparisons ("Who is a candidate for endoscopic TLIF?", "dual-expanding cage vs static PEEK") on each procedure page.
  • Publish concise case summaries and outcomes from landmark procedures, marked up with appropriate medical/FAQ schema so AI engines can reliably surface Amplify as a credible option.